Sturgeon and Drakeford call for Covid summit to be ‘meaningful discussion’

The pair have criticised Boris Johnson’s office for sending ‘a very rough proposed agenda’ with issues in the discussions seemingly yet to be agreed.
Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and Welsh First Minister Mark Drakeford pictured in 2019 (Daniel Leal-Olivas/PA)
PA Archive
Douglas Barrie25 May 2021

The First Ministers of Scotland and Wales have written to Boris Johnson calling on the proposed coronavirus recovery summit to be a “meaningful discussion with substantive outcomes”.

Nicola Sturgeon and Mark Drakeford are asking the Prime Minister for more clarity and substance around the proposal which would bring the four UK nations together this Thursday.

In the letter, copied to Arlene Foster and Michelle O’Neill, the pair criticise Mr Johnson’s office for sending “a very rough proposed agenda” with key issues in the discussions seemingly yet to be agreed.

They also make a case for “further discussion” to take place ahead of the summit which would see such an event delayed, but still have it take place “perhaps as early as next week”.

As we are sure you do, we want the meeting to be a meaningful discussion with substantive outcomes, and not just a PR exercise

Nicola Sturgeon and Mark Drakeford

The letter states: “We are writing about the proposed 4-nations summit on Covid recovery, which you have suggested should take place this Thursday afternoon.

“We are both deeply committed to taking part in such a summit and to working appropriately together on Covid Recovery – but, as we are sure you do, we want the meeting to be a meaningful discussion with substantive outcomes, and not just a PR exercise.

“Our view is that this will be best achieved if further detailed preparation is done in advance.

“In particular, we would propose early discussion to reach agreement on the following –

“1. A detailed agenda. Your office sent a very rough proposed agenda only yesterday morning and our view is that further work is needed to agree key issues for discussion and any supporting papers to be prepared;

“2. What outcomes/further process we are seeking to achieve as a result of the summit discussion.

“Further discussion between our officials, leading to the summit taking place on an agreed date, perhaps as early as next week, would allow for a much more meaningful exercise, and avoid the risk of it being just a PR or box-ticking exercise.

“We are sure that is what we all want.”

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in