Cable stands by call to split banks

Vince Cable said his plan to separate the high street banks from more risky operations is still on the table
12 April 2012

Business Secretary Vince Cable has insisted that his call for the full separation of high street banks from their more risky "casino" operations remains on the table, despite Chancellor George Osborne's public endorsement of a less radical alternative.

Mr Cable used a speech in London to set out a series of tests which must be met before he will give his backing to proposals for a "ring-fence" to isolate retail and investment activities within the same institution.

He insisted that the Government would not come to a "firm conclusion" on the issue until after the final report of Sir John Vickers' Independent Commission on Banking in September.

But he accepted that if his tests are met and the Vickers Commission shows that ring-fencing can be as effective as full separation at lower cost, "then that, I am sure, is the direction we will go in".

Mr Cable made clear that there was no question of retaining the status quo, which was blamed for aggravating instability at the time of the financial crisis of 2008. And he said that the Government will act quickly to implement change as soon as possible after the publication of the final Vickers Commission report.

Mr Cable has been a long-standing advocate of splitting up the banks to avoid a repeat of the taxpayer-funded bailouts of institutions which were deemed "too big to fail". But his hopes of achieving this goal received a knock in June when Mr Osborne publicly endorsed the ring-fencing proposals in the Commission's interim report.

Mr Cable suggested that Mr Osborne's comments did not represent the Government's final judgment on the issue: "The Government will be seeking reassurance from the final report in demonstrating that a ring-fence can be as effective as full separation at lower cost.

"The key tests will be: would it stop banks using deposits underwritten by the taxpayer to cross-subsidise their other activities, the so-called 'casinos'?; will the ring-fence be high enough and Chinese walls strong enough to eliminate regulatory arbitrage by banks?; will the division between what is inside and outside the ring-fence ensure that nothing resembling a universal bank remains?

Britain was in a "dangerous" position when banks headquartered in the UK had balance sheets of £7 trillion - four times UK GDP - but could not be allowed to fail if their investment gambles go wrong because of the knock-on effect on ordinary customers' savings, said Mr Cable.

The Bank of England later announced that the major banks' lending in the second quarter of 2011 under the Project Merlin arrangements will be published on August 12.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in