Man who kicked police officer during protest spared prison

Alfie Hubbard was said to be among a group of ‘agitators’ who claimed they were protecting statues during Black Lives Matter protests.
General views of Southwark Crown Court (Sean Dempsey/PA)
PA Archive
Henry Vaughan8 July 2021

A man who fly kicked a police officer in the back during protests in Westminster has been spared jail.

Alfie Hubbard, 26, was handed a two-year prison sentence, suspended for two years, at Southwark Crown Court on Thursday after previously admitting violent disorder on June 13 last year.

Prosecutor Fer Chinner said he was among a group of “right-wing extremists” who took to the streets of London as “agitators”, claiming they were protecting statues.

The demonstrations, which saw police officers pelted with missiles and abused, took place following global Black Lives Matter (BLM) marches, that were sparked by the death of George Floyd in the US in May last year.

Shirtless Daniel Allan, 35, wearing a pair of luminous yellow shorts, kicked Sergeant Richard Lambert in the back, sending him to the ground.

Footage played in court shows Hubbard, dressed in a green tracksuit, landing a second kick as Sgt Lambert tried to get back to his feet.

Ms Chinner said: “In a gratuitous and cowardly act of violence, Mr Hubbard ran towards the officer and fly kicked him in his back before running away.”

Allan, from Sunderland, who had 51 previous convictions for a total of 111 offences, was jailed by Judge Sally Cahill QC for 28 months last year after pleading guilty to violent disorder.

Daniel Allan (Metropolitan Police/PA)
PA Media

But the same judge spared Hubbard, from Bermondsey, south east London, an immediate prison sentence after hearing he had developed a “serious health condition” and has been subject to a curfew for nearly a year.

“For those two reasons I am going to suspend the sentence,” she said.

“It is unusual for me to do so in the nature of this type of offending, an incident of violent disorder on a police officer, but because of your particular circumstances I shall do so.”

Metropolitan Police Federation chairman Ken Marsh said of the sentence: “It’s not enough and it should be more.”

“Any assault on a police officer should be dealt with in the most officious way, we believe, and we don’t think the sentencing is correct for assaulting a police officer in this way,” he said.

“It needs to be far higher to send a clear message to the public that you can’t behave towards the police in this way.”

In a victim impact statement read in court Sgt Lambert said he had never been subjected to such an assault in his 14 years as a police officer.

“I’m more anxious since the attack.

“I have had trouble sleeping with bad dreams which centre around the attack when I can sleep,” he said.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in