Half a million names on controversial DNA database contain errors
More than half a million names on the controversial DNA database are known to be false, misspelt or incorrect, the Government has admitted.
Ministers have disclosed that more than 500,000 - or one in seven - of the genetic profiles on the database are "replicas".
The disclosure raises urgent questions about the integrity and accuracy of the whole system.
Around 4 million names are on the database, which is the biggest in the world and holds details of not only rapists and murderers, but also suspects arrested but not charged for relatively minor crimes.
Thousands asked to give their details to police upon arrest have given false names or alternative spellings of their names.
In other cases, mistakes have been made by police in the spelling of names. Some files include names belonging to someone else, or names of people who do not exist. Altogether there are 550,000 "replica" files.
MPs have questioned whether the false data could lead to innocent people, whose names may have been maliciously given to police by suspects, being questioned about crimes they have not committed.
The Government admits it does not know how many files in total are inaccurate. It has only calculated those with replica DNA samples elsewhere on the system, but there could be many more errors.
Lynne Featherstone, the Liberal Democrat MP for Hornsey and Wood Green, called for an urgent investigation and questioned why so much inaccurate information was on the system.
"If the database is to be of any use, then it has to be accurate.
"DNA data is open to abuse and this could allow people who mean no good to do no good. The more failsafe the police regard DNA, the easier it is to set someone up," she said.
Figures also show that the profiles of 150,000 children under the age of 16 are on the DNA database. Most of them were arrested by police but found to be innocent or not charged with any crime.
The database is already the largest in the world, but the police want to expand files on the system to include people caught dropping litter, dodging rail fares or failing to scoop up their dogs' waste.
Shami Chakrabarti, the director of the civil rights group Liberty, said: "It's bad enough that we have a DNA database stuffed with innocents not charged with any offence, containing too many children and too great a percentage of ethnic minorities.
"Now it turns out that we don't know the accuracy of the data.
"How many Postman Pats and Donald Ducks have entries on a system worthy of the Keystone Cops? This is hardly an advert for those who want to make the DNA database universal."
A Home Office spokesman said that the police and DNA custodian unit, which oversees the database, were working hard to get rid of inaccurate files and were cross-checking fingerprints with DNA samples to ensure that the identities given by suspects were accurate.
