Climate talks on brink of collapse as rich and poor nations collide

Terry Kirby12 April 2012

Hopes of a deal on climate change were threatened today by a clash between rich and poor nations.

Developing countries reacted furiously to a leaked draft agreement which would allow rich countries to link financial aid to cuts in carbon emissions in the third world. The document was drawn up in Copenhagen by the Danish hosts in conjunction with countries such as Britain and America.

Although some observers suggested the agreement was one of many in circulation, the angry reaction created serious divisions between nations.

African countries hit by drought and island states in danger of being overwhelmed by rising sea levels claim that the draft text reverses the main tenet of the Kyoto agreement, which put the onus on Western countries, which have created the bulk of carbon emissions, to take action against climate change.

Lumumba Di-Aping, the Sudanese ambassador to the US and lead negotiator for the G77 group of developing countries, was quoted as saying: "The text is a very serious development and very unfortunate. It is a major violation that threatens the success of the Copenhagen negotiations.

"The Danish text destroys both the Kyoto protocol and the UN framework convention on climate change itself. It superimposes a solution on developing countries."

Andy Atkins, executive director of Friends of the Earth, told the Guardian that the text was "profoundly destructive" and violated the principle of the UN negotiations.

The document is said to propose that rich countries would be allowed carbon emission targets twice as high as developing nations in the future.

Developing countries say the document put power over climate change in the hand of bodies such as the World Bank, which favour bigger nations.

Antonio Hill, climate adviser for Oxfam International, said: "It highlights the risk that when the big countries come together, the small ones get hurt."

The Danish delegation refused to comment, but UK sources played down the significance of the leak. The UN said the paper was an informal document.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in